lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:19:52 +0100
From:	Víctor M. Jáquez L. <vjaquez@...lia.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:	Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@...com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Armando Uribe <x0095078@...com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] staging: tidspbridge: silence the compiler

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:05:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:12:20AM +0100, Víctor Manuel Jáquez Leal wrote:
> > Silence the warning when compiling drv_interface.c
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Víctor Manuel Jáquez Leal <vjaquez@...lia.com>
> 
> What does the compiler warn about here?  Normally you would cut and
> paste the warning into the commit message.  But at least give us a
> hint.
> 
> You could also reformat that printk so the message is on one line.
> 
> 	dev_dbg(bridge,
> 	        "%s: vm filp %p offset %x start %lx end %lx page_prot %ulx flags %lx\n",
> 		__func__, filp, offset, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end,
> 		vma->vm_page_prot, vma->vm_flags);

Ok. I'll do it.

I have a doubt about the process in this case: if this is the only
modification request, should I resend all the patch set, or just this one?

Thanks

vmjl

> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 
> 



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ