[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120131113452.GA3235@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:34:52 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <wfg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix readahead pipeline break caused by block plug
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 06:57:54PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> The problem is, there are a dozen of ->direct_IO callback functions.
> While there are only two ->direct_IO() callers, one for READ and
> another for WRITE, which are much easier to deal with.
So what? Better do a bit more work now and keep the damn thing
maintainable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists