linux-kernel - Re: sysfs regression: wrong link counts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:44:11 -0800
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	systemd-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: sysfs regression: wrong link counts

Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz> writes:

> Oh, we are not going to break userspace with 3.3, are we? 

No.  This code is currently scheduled for 3.4.

> I understand
> that what sensors do is nothing but sh*t. But this change should wait
> until everybody has a chance to have fixed sensors package in their
> distribution.
>
> To be clear, what I'm suggesting is to postpone the change and schedule
> it for something like 3.7.

The sensors update with the fix is scheduled for about a week out, well
before 3.3 ships.

The code in next for 3.4 is perhaps 4-6 months out from a kernel
release.  That seems like plenty of time for distros to get an update
package for sensors together.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/