[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F2885EC.8070900@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:23:08 +1100
From: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: Jan Harkes <jaharkes@...cmu.edu>, coda@...cmu.edu,
codalist@...a.cs.cmu.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] coda: Remove unnecessary OOM messages
On 01/02/12 11:21, Joe Perches wrote:
>> Since CODA_ALLOC no longer uses __FILE__ and __LINE__ and doesn't use
>> the cast argument any more, it can be replaced with a static inline
>> function. Something like this (untested, applies on top of your patch):
>
> Hi Ryan.
>
> I didn't want to be quite so invasive
> but this looks like a nice cleanup to me.
Yeah, it needed to be done as a separate patch. Just a good time to do
it now that it no longer needs to be a macro.
> Maybe because alloc/free functions are
> used relatively infrequently, maybe it'd
> be better to not declare the functions
> inline but add them to coda_linux.c
Sure, either approach is fine. Do you want to add the patch to your series?
~Ryan
>
>> +static inline void *coda_alloc(size_t size)
>> +{
>> + if (size < PAGE_SIZE)
>> + return kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + return vzalloc(size);
>> +}
> []
>> +static inline void coda_free(const void *ptr, size_t size)
>> +{
>> + if (size < PAGE_SIZE)
>> + kfree(ptr);
>> + else
>> + vfree(ptr);
>> +}
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists