linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] coda: Remove unnecessary OOM messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1328055976.14714.7.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date:	Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:26:16 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>
Cc:	Jan Harkes <jaharkes@...cmu.edu>, coda@...cmu.edu,
	codalist@...a.cs.cmu.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] coda: Remove unnecessary OOM messages

On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 11:23 +1100, Ryan Mallon wrote:
> On 01/02/12 11:21, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Maybe because alloc/free functions are
> > used relatively infrequently, maybe it'd
> > be better to not declare the functions
> > inline but add them to coda_linux.c
> Sure, either approach is fine. Do you want to add the patch to your series?

I think Jan can work it out properly if he wants it.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/