[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120203133950.GA1690@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:39:50 +0100
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
Geunsik Lim <geunsik.lim@...il.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handling of unused variable 'do-numainfo on compilation
time
Michal, this keeps coming up, please decide between the proposed
solutions ;-)
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 05:43:47PM +0900, Geunsik Lim wrote:
> Actually, Usage of the variable 'do_numainfo'is not suitable for gcc compiler.
> Declare the variable 'do_numainfo' if the number of NUMA nodes > 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geunsik Lim <geunsik.lim@...sung.com>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 556859f..4e17ac5 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -776,7 +776,10 @@ static void memcg_check_events(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct page *page)
> /* threshold event is triggered in finer grain than soft limit */
> if (unlikely(mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
> MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH))) {
> - bool do_softlimit, do_numainfo;
> + bool do_softlimit;
> +#if MAX_NUMNODES > 1
> + bool do_numainfo;
> +#endif
>
> do_softlimit = mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
> MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_SOFTLIMIT);
> --
> 1.7.8.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists