linux-kernel - [PATCH] vfs: Avoid IPI storm due to bh LRU invalidation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1328536531-19034-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
Date:	Mon,  6 Feb 2012 14:55:31 +0100
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, hare@...e.de,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH] vfs: Avoid IPI storm due to bh LRU invalidation

When discovery of lots of disks happen in parallel, we call
invalidate_bh_lrus() once for each disk from partitioning code resulting in a
storm of IPIs and causing a softlockup detection to fire (it takes several
*minutes* for a machine to execute all the invalidate_bh_lrus() calls).

Fix the issue by allowing only single invalidation to run using a mutex and let
waiters for mutex figure out whether someone invalidated LRUs for them while
they were waiting.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
 fs/buffer.c |   23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

  I feel this is slightly hacky approach but it works. If someone has better
idea, please speak up.

diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index 1a30db7..56b0d2b 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -1384,10 +1384,31 @@ static void invalidate_bh_lru(void *arg)
 	}
 	put_cpu_var(bh_lrus);
 }
-	
+
+/*
+ * Invalidate all buffers in LRUs. Since we have to signal all CPUs to
+ * invalidate their per-cpu local LRU lists this is rather expensive operation.
+ * So we optimize the case of several parallel calls to invalidate_bh_lrus()
+ * which happens from partitioning code when lots of disks appear in the
+ * system during boot.
+ */
 void invalidate_bh_lrus(void)
 {
+	static DEFINE_MUTEX(bh_invalidate_mutex);
+	static long bh_invalidate_sequence;
+
+	long my_bh_invalidate_sequence = bh_invalidate_sequence;
+
+	mutex_lock(&bh_invalidate_mutex);
+	/* Someone did bh invalidation while we were sleeping? */
+	if (my_bh_invalidate_sequence != bh_invalidate_sequence)
+		goto out;
+	bh_invalidate_sequence++;
+	/* Inc of bh_invalidate_sequence must happen before we invalidate bhs */
+	smp_wmb();
 	on_each_cpu(invalidate_bh_lru, NULL, 1);
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&bh_invalidate_mutex);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(invalidate_bh_lrus);
 
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/