linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] killing boilerplate checks in ->link/->mkdir/->rename

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120206135655.GF23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 6 Feb 2012 13:56:55 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] killing boilerplate checks in ->link/->mkdir/->rename

On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 10:50:44AM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:

> WRT 'sen_nlink()' - I can use it instead of 'drop_nlink()'/'inc_nlink()'
> of course. But I do not really see why is this better. E.g.,
> 'drop_nlink()' additionally gives me ' WARN_ON()' in case of 'i_nlink'
> wrapping.

So does inc_nlink() when you are asking to get from nlink=0 to nlink=1.
I.e. on failure exit in your unlink()...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/