[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120207064809.GA29061@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 10:48:09 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/8] Fixes for common mistakes w/ for_each_process and
task->mm
Hi all,
While working on lowmemorykiller driver, I stumbled upon several places
where we traverse the tasklist in an unsafe manner, plus there are a
few cases of unsafe access to task->mm.
Note that some patches were not tested (e.g. sh, blackfin), so please
take a closer look if there's silly mistakes. Also special attention
needed for patch 7/8 (UML specific).
Oleg,
For sysrq case I kept the force_sig() usage, this is because in sysrq
case I belive we do want to kill PID namespace init processes. If using
force_sig() is still a bad idea, I guess we should fix it somehow
else.
Thanks.
--
Anton Vorontsov
Email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists