[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F312772.6090000@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:30:26 +0200
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>,
Misael Lopez Cruz <misael.lopez@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] MFD: TWL6040: Add regulator support for VIO, V2V1
supplies
On 02/07/2012 03:16 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> though I'd be inclined to just embed this structure into the twl6040
> struct directly, you're always going to need to allocate it and it saves
> a tiny bit of error handling and whatnot.
True. I'm not sure why I have settled with this solution... As I recall
I just did not wanted to add the regulator related includes to the
mfd/twl6040.h header.
--
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists