[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F31848A.9070406@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:07:38 +0000
From: Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@...hat.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Andrew Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptrace: add ability to get clear_tid_address
On 02/03/2012 04:51 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 02/03, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> Because there's no need for current to get this value of himself, but can
>> be useful for e.g. gdb.
>
> OK, perhaps this makes sense, I do not know.
>
> Jan, Pedro, do you think gdb can use PTRACE_GET_TID_ADDRESS (returns
> tracee->clear_child_tid) ?
Off hand, I'm not picturing a use. But that may well just mean I'm lacking
imagination. Andrew, Pavel, did you have a particular idea in mind when you
said it may be useful for debugging a multithreading program / gdb?
--
Pedro Alves
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists