[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F325103.4000908@nod.at>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:40:03 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
CC: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
jengelh@...ozas.de, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Netfilter: xt_LOG: Implement ring buffer support
On 08.02.2012 11:29, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 01:14:52AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> This patch introduces NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_LOG_RING.
>> It allows logging into various ring buffers which are
>> represented as pipe-like files in /proc/net/netfilter/xt_LOG_ring/.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger<richard@....at>
>> ---
>> include/linux/netfilter/xt_LOG.h | 13 +-
>> include/net/netfilter/nf_log.h | 1 +
>> include/net/netfilter/xt_log_ring.h | 24 +
>> net/netfilter/Kconfig | 13 +
>> net/netfilter/Makefile | 2 +
>> net/netfilter/xt_LOG.c | 921 -----------------------------
>> net/netfilter/xt_LOG_core.c | 1108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> net/netfilter/xt_LOG_ring.c | 430 ++++++++++++++
>
> Can you avoid this rename and splitting LOG into two files? I prefer
> having everything into the same file xt_LOG.c.
Sure, I'll merge it into one file.
I made the split to keep xt_LOG_core.c clean.
99% of xt_LOG_ring.c has nothing to do with netfilter and is just
ring_buffer and proc stuff.
> Apart from that, this looks fine to me.
:-)
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists