lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120208150715.GB25473@somewhere.redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:07:18 +0100
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com,
	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu, robert.richter@....com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf: perf sched warning possibly due to clock granularity
 on AMD

On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 02:25:46PM +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am running 3.3.30-rc2 on an AMD Bulldozer system in 64-bit mode.
> I was testing perf sched and I ran into an issue. That issue seems
> to exist only on AMD and not on Intel systems. It is not PMU related
> because I am doing tracing.
> 
> I am running a simple ping pong test to stress the context switch
> code. Two processes exchanging a byte through a pipe (program provided
> below).
> 
> Then, I capture a trace using perf sched, and I run sched lat, but
> on certain runs, I get:
> 
>    $ perf sched rec pong 2
>    $ perf sched lat
>      Warning: Timestamp below last timeslice flush
>      Warning: Timestamp below last timeslice flush
>      Warning: Timestamp below last timeslice flush
>      Warning: Timestamp below last timeslice flush
>      Warning: Timestamp below last timeslice flush
>      Warning: Timestamp below last timeslice flush
>      Warning: Timestamp below last timeslice flush
>      Warning: Timestamp below last timeslice flush
>      Warning: TimesFound 4934 unknown events!
>      Is this an older tool processing a perf.data file generated by a more recent tool?

I've tried to reproduce this on an AMD phenom but haven't got any such
warning.

Is there any chance you could "perf archive" your data and upload it somewhere
I can fetch it from?

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ