linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] perf: perf sched warning possibly due to clock granularity on AMD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABPqkBT7bTZ83j2yjWoQO-HQhg+=WsqD0sE_D+_Vi_HTZKKCxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:10:24 +0100
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com,
	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu, robert.richter@....com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf: perf sched warning possibly due to clock granularity
 on AMD

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 02:25:46PM +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am running 3.3.30-rc2 on an AMD Bulldozer system in 64-bit mode.
>> I was testing perf sched and I ran into an issue. That issue seems
>> to exist only on AMD and not on Intel systems. It is not PMU related
>> because I am doing tracing.
>>
>> I am running a simple ping pong test to stress the context switch
>> code. Two processes exchanging a byte through a pipe (program provided
>> below).
>>
>> Then, I capture a trace using perf sched, and I run sched lat, but
>> on certain runs, I get:
>>
>>    $ perf sched rec pong 2
>>    $ perf sched lat
>>      Warning: Timestamp below last timeslice flush
>>      Warning: Timestamp below last timeslice flush
>>      Warning: Timestamp below last timeslice flush
>>      Warning: Timestamp below last timeslice flush
>>      Warning: Timestamp below last timeslice flush
>>      Warning: Timestamp below last timeslice flush
>>      Warning: Timestamp below last timeslice flush
>>      Warning: Timestamp below last timeslice flush
>>      Warning: TimesFound 4934 unknown events!
>>      Is this an older tool processing a perf.data file generated by a more recent tool?
>
> I've tried to reproduce this on an AMD phenom but haven't got any such
> warning.
>
It does not happen at each run.

> Is there any chance you could "perf archive" your data and upload it somewhere
> I can fetch it from?
>
I can send you the perf.data in a private Email.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/