[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120209075701.GE18387@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 08:57:01 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, paul@...lmenage.org,
rjw@...k.pl, tj@...nel.org, frank.rowand@...sony.com,
pjt@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
prashanth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Fix CPU online handling
related to cpusets
* Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> IOW, consider:
>
> cpuset A has 0-10
>
> - Take CPU 10 offline
> [We are forced to remove CPU 10 from cpuset A, which becomes 0-9 now]
>
>
> <Userspace didn't request any change to cpuset A>
>
>
> - Bring back CPU 10 online
>
> Now cpuset A is still 0-9! IMO, it should have been 0-10.
Why is CPU 10 taken out of the cpuset to begin with?
The cpuset code should be fixed to work with offline CPUs as
well - it can obviously not schedule to them, but otherwise it
should be fine to have a wider cpuset than the hw can support.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists