[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F33BFDE.7020006@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 18:15:18 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: "gregkh@...e.de" <gregkh@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] regmap: add bulk_write() for non-volatile register
set
On Thursday 09 February 2012 05:47 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 05:42:11PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
>> + if (vol || map->cache_type == REGCACHE_NONE) {
>> + ret = _regmap_raw_write(map, reg, val, val_bytes * val_count);
> You still need to do the byte swap here.
I saw the regmap_raw_write() and it is using the same way without byte
swapping.
Want to use the same function as it is.. I am not sure why do we require
byte-swapping in this case. Required things will be done by
_regmap_raw_write only.
This api just break the transfer in register-wise if any of the register
is cached..
>> + } else {
>> + for (i = 0; i< val_count; i++) {
>> + memcpy(map->work_buf, val + (i * val_bytes), val_bytes);
>> + ival = map->format.parse_val(map->work_buf);
> They're currently symmetric but really this should use format_val().
>
The format_val is require integer argument and issue is that I dont have
this otherwise I need not to parse, can use directly.
Am I missing something here?
> * Unknown Key
> * 0x6E30FDDD
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists