linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block: strip out locking optimization in put_io

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:22:32 +0800
From:	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@...nline.de>, mroos@...ux.ee
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: strip out locking optimization in put_io_context()

2012/2/9 Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>:
> Hello, Shaohua.
>
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:29:53PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
>> > the test adds mem=4G in a 2 sockets 16 CPU machine.
>> > just make several copy of kernel source in tmpfs (so there is swap
>> > depending on your
>> > memory size) and run kernel build in the kernel source in the meaning time.
>> > there is only one swap device which is a rotating disk.
>> >
>> > I'll test both patches soon.
>>
>> Tried all the options, the regression still exists. Any new idea?
>> I'll spend some time on it if I can get anything
>
> Can you please try the following one?  Thanks a lot!
doesn't work.
I also double confirmed b2efa05265d62 causes the regression
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/