[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4F354AB6020000780007267B@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:49:58 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: <liang.tang@...cle.com>
Cc: <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
<mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/5] EFI: add efi driver for Xen efi
>>> On 09.02.12 at 04:33, Tang Liang <liang.tang@...cle.com> wrote:
As noted in a private mail already, this lack a From:, as large parts of
this are quite obviously derived from what we have in our SLE and
openSUSE trees. Feel free to also stick my Signed-off-by in further
down.
> The efi memory is owned by Xen and efi run-time service can not be called
> directly,so a new efi driver is needed by Xen efi.
> We call efi run-time service through the Xen in Xen efi driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Liang <liang.tang@...cle.com>
>
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/Makefile
> @@ -1 +1,4 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_EFI) += efi.o efi_$(BITS).o efi_stub_$(BITS).o
> +ifdef CONFIG_XEN
> +obj-$(CONFIG_EFI) += efi-xen.o
Calling this just xen.c would seem more natural to me. The *-xen.c
naming convention really is necessary only in the legacy (and forward
ported) trees.
> +endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-xen.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-xen.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f4f6235
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-xen.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,432 @@
> +/*
> + * Common EFI (Extensible Firmware Interface) support functions
> + * Based on Extensible Firmware Interface Specification version 1.0
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 1999 VA Linux Systems
> + * Copyright (C) 1999 Walt Drummond <drummond@...inux.com>
> + * Copyright (C) 1999-2002 Hewlett-Packard Co.
> + * David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@....hp.com>
> + * Stephane Eranian <eranian@....hp.com>
> + * Copyright (C) 2005-2008 Intel Co.
> + * Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
> + * Bibo Mao <bibo.mao@...el.com>
> + * Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@...ux.intel.com>
> + * Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
> + * Copyright (C) 2011-2012 Oracle Co.
> + * Liang Tang <liang.tang@...cle.com>
> + *
I think everything between here ...
> + * Copied from efi_32.c to eliminate the duplicated code between EFI
> + * 32/64 support code. --ying 2007-10-26
> + *
> + * All EFI Runtime Services are not implemented yet as EFI only
> + * supports physical mode addressing on SoftSDV. This is to be fixed
> + * in a future version. --drummond 1999-07-20
> + *
> + * Implemented EFI runtime services and virtual mode calls. --davidm
> + *
> + * Goutham Rao: <goutham.rao@...el.com>
> + * Skip non-WB memory and ignore empty memory ranges.
... and here is meaningless in this file.
> + */
>...
> +struct efi __read_mostly efi_xen = {
With this just being copied in an __init function below, this can be
both static and __initdata (or even const __initconst).
> + .mps = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
> + .acpi = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
> + .acpi20 = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
> + .smbios = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
> + .sal_systab = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
> + .boot_info = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
> + .hcdp = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
> + .uga = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
> + .uv_systab = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
> + .get_time = xen_efi_get_time,
> + .set_time = xen_efi_set_time,
> + .get_wakeup_time = xen_efi_get_wakeup_time,
> + .set_wakeup_time = xen_efi_set_wakeup_time,
> + .get_variable = xen_efi_get_variable,
> + .get_next_variable = xen_efi_get_next_variable,
> + .set_variable = xen_efi_set_variable,
> + .get_next_high_mono_count = xen_efi_get_next_high_mono_count,
> + .query_variable_info = xen_efi_query_variable_info,
> + .update_capsule = xen_efi_update_capsule,
> + .query_capsule_caps = xen_efi_query_capsule_caps,
> +};
>...
> +static void efi_enter_virtual_mode_xen(void) { };
> +static void efi_reserve_boot_services_xen(void) { };
With the generic wrapper checking for NULL pointers I don't see why you
need empty placeholders here.
> +
> +struct efi_init_funcs xen_efi_funcs = {
static const.
> + .__efi_init = efi_init_xen,
> + .__efi_reserve_boot_services = efi_reserve_boot_services_xen,
> + .__efi_enter_virtual_mode = efi_enter_virtual_mode_xen,
> + .__efi_mem_type = efi_mem_type_xen,
> + .__efi_mem_attributes = efi_mem_attributes_xen
> +};
> +
> +static void register_xen_efi_function(void)
> +{
> + efi_init_function_register(&xen_efi_funcs);
> +}
> --- a/include/linux/efi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/efi.h
> @@ -476,6 +476,7 @@ extern struct efi_memory_map memmap;
> extern void efi_init_function_register(struct efi_init_funcs *funcs);
> extern void get_efi_table_info(efi_config_table_t *config_tables, int
> nr_tables,
> struct efi *efi_t);
> +extern void __init xen_efi_probe(void);
No __init in declarations.
Jan
>
> /**
> * efi_range_is_wc - check the WC bit on an address range
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists