linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/5] EFI: Provide registration for efi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <4F355AC50200007800072701@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:58:29 +0000
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	<xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	<liang.tang@...cle.com>, <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/5] EFI: Provide registration for
 efi_init.. etc efi public function

>>> On 09.02.12 at 04:32, Tang Liang <liang.tang@...cle.com> wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,23 @@
>  #define PFX 		"EFI: "
>  
>  int efi_enabled;
> +
> +static void efi_init_generic(void);
> +
> +static void efi_enter_virtual_mode_generic(void);
> +static u32 efi_mem_type_generic(unsigned long phys_addr);
> +static u64 efi_mem_attributes_generic(unsigned long phys_addr);
> +
> +struct efi_init_funcs efi_generic_funcs = {

static const.

> +	.__efi_init		     = efi_init_generic,
> +	.__efi_reserve_boot_services = efi_reserve_boot_services_generic,
> +	.__efi_enter_virtual_mode    = efi_enter_virtual_mode_generic,
> +	.__efi_mem_type		     = efi_mem_type_generic,
> +	.__efi_mem_attributes	     = efi_mem_attributes_generic
> +};
> +
> +struct efi_init_funcs *efi_override_funcs =  &efi_generic_funcs;

const struct ...

> +
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(efi_enabled);
>  
>  struct efi __read_mostly efi = {
> @@ -781,3 +798,41 @@ u64 efi_mem_attributes(unsigned long phys_addr)
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +void efi_init_function_register(struct efi_init_funcs *funcs)

... (const struct ...

> +{
> +	efi_override_funcs = funcs;
> +}
> +
> +void __init efi_init(void)
> +{
> +	if (efi_override_funcs->__efi_init)
> +		efi_override_funcs->__efi_init();
> +}
> +
> +void __init efi_reserve_boot_services(void)
> +{
> +	if (efi_override_funcs->__efi_reserve_boot_services)
> +		efi_override_funcs->__efi_reserve_boot_services();
> +}
> +
> +void __init efi_enter_virtual_mode(void)
> +{
> +	if (efi_override_funcs->__efi_enter_virtual_mode)
> +		efi_override_funcs->__efi_enter_virtual_mode();
> +}
> +
> +
> +u32 efi_mem_type(unsigned long phys_addr)
> +{
> +	if (efi_override_funcs->__efi_mem_type)
> +		return efi_override_funcs->__efi_mem_type(phys_addr);
> +	return EFI_INVALID_TYPE;
> +}
> +
> +u64 efi_mem_attributes(unsigned long phys_addr)
> +{
> +	if (efi_override_funcs->__efi_mem_attributes)
> +		return efi_override_funcs->__efi_mem_attributes(phys_addr);
> +	return EFI_INVALID_ATTRIBUTE;
> +}
> --- a/include/linux/efi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/efi.h
> @@ -79,8 +79,9 @@ typedef	struct {
>  #define EFI_MEMORY_MAPPED_IO_PORT_SPACE	12
>  #define EFI_PAL_CODE			13
>  #define EFI_MAX_MEMORY_TYPE		14
> -

I would suggest to retain the newline.

> +#define EFI_INVALID_TYPE		0xffffffff
>  /* Attribute values: */
> +#define EFI_INVALID_ATTRIBUTE	((u64)0x0000000000000000ULL)	/* invalid attribute*/
>  #define EFI_MEMORY_UC		((u64)0x0000000000000001ULL)	/* uncached */
>  #define EFI_MEMORY_WC		((u64)0x0000000000000002ULL)	/* write-coalescing */
>  #define EFI_MEMORY_WT		((u64)0x0000000000000004ULL)	/* write-through */
> @@ -434,6 +435,14 @@ extern struct efi {
>  	efi_set_virtual_address_map_t *set_virtual_address_map;
>  } efi;
>  
> +struct efi_init_funcs {
> +	void (*__efi_init)(void);
> +	void (*__efi_reserve_boot_services)(void);
> +	void (*__efi_enter_virtual_mode)(void);
> +	u32 (*__efi_mem_type)(unsigned long phys_addr);
> +	u64 (*__efi_mem_attributes)(unsigned long phys_addr);

What is the reason for having the __ (or even the whole __efi_) at
their beginning?

Jan

> +};
> +
>  static inline int
>  efi_guidcmp (efi_guid_t left, efi_guid_t right)
>  {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/