[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJafhzQV821ij62y_TQr9M3jHyyDdovi0P30kidv7H8fsoqKPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:45:54 +0100
From: Christian Brunner <chb@....de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: ixgbe truesize underestimation fix missing?
Back in Oktober, there was a patch by Eric Dumazet for the ixgbe
driver to fix the skb truesize underestimation (commit
98130646770db42cd14c44ba0d7f2d0eb8078820). It changed only one line in
ixgbe_main.c:
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
@@ -1326,7 +1326,7 @@ static bool ixgbe_clean_rx_irq(struct
ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector,
skb->len += upper_len;
skb->data_len += upper_len;
- skb->truesize += upper_len;
+ skb->truesize += PAGE_SIZE / 2;
} i++;
But when I look at the current code (3.2.5 or 3.3rc), skb->truesize is
still increased by the same value as skb->data_len.
1228 skb->data_len += frag_list_size;
1229 skb->truesize += frag_list_size;
Is it posible that there was a merge conflict, or am I missing something here?
Thanks,
Christian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists