[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1329123803.2336.0.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:03:23 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Christian Brunner <chb@....de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ixgbe truesize underestimation fix missing?
Le lundi 13 février 2012 à 09:45 +0100, Christian Brunner a écrit :
> Back in Oktober, there was a patch by Eric Dumazet for the ixgbe
> driver to fix the skb truesize underestimation (commit
> 98130646770db42cd14c44ba0d7f2d0eb8078820). It changed only one line in
> ixgbe_main.c:
>
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> @@ -1326,7 +1326,7 @@ static bool ixgbe_clean_rx_irq(struct
> ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector,
> skb->len += upper_len;
> skb->data_len += upper_len;
> - skb->truesize += upper_len;
> + skb->truesize += PAGE_SIZE / 2;
> } i++;
>
>
> But when I look at the current code (3.2.5 or 3.3rc), skb->truesize is
> still increased by the same value as skb->data_len.
>
> 1228 skb->data_len += frag_list_size;
> 1229 skb->truesize += frag_list_size;
>
> Is it posible that there was a merge conflict, or am I missing something here?
Maybe a problem in your local tree ?
I can see proper fix in current tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists