[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F387460.8090506@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:24:32 +0800
From: Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
CC: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ying.huang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi/apei/einj: Add extensions to EINJ from rev 5.0 of
acpi spec
δΊ 2012/2/12 17:33, Jiang Liu ει:
> Hi Tony and Gong,
> Should we remove the target memory address from the resource list of
> ACPI5 trigger too? Otherwise we may also encounter resource conflict with ACPI5
> trigger table.
>
> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int __einj_error_trigger(u64 trigger_paddr, u32 type,
> * This will cause resource conflict with regular memory. So
> * remove it from trigger table resources.
> */
> - if (param_extension&& (type& 0x0038)&& param2) {
> + if ((param_extension || acpi5)&& (type& 0x0038)&& param2) {
> struct apei_resources addr_resources;
> apei_resources_init(&addr_resources);
> trigger_param_region = einj_get_trigger_parameter_region(
>
> On 01/18/2012 04:10 AM, Tony Luck wrote:
>> @@ -293,12 +386,56 @@ static int __einj_error_inject(u32 type, u64 param1, u64 param2)
>> if (rc)
>> return rc;
>> apei_exec_ctx_set_input(&ctx, type);
>> - rc = apei_exec_run(&ctx, ACPI_EINJ_SET_ERROR_TYPE);
>> - if (rc)
>> - return rc;
>> - if (einj_param) {
>> - writeq(param1,&einj_param->param1);
>> - writeq(param2,&einj_param->param2);
>> + if (acpi5) {
>> + struct set_error_type_with_address *v5param = einj_param;
>> +
>> + writel(type,&v5param->type);
>> + if (type& 0x80000000) {
>> + switch (vendor_flags) {
>> + case SETWA_FLAGS_APICID:
>> + writel(param1,&v5param->apicid);
>> + break;
>> + case SETWA_FLAGS_MEM:
>> + writeq(param1,&v5param->memory_address);
>> + writeq(param2,&v5param->memory_address_range);
>> + break;
>> + case SETWA_FLAGS_PCIE_SBDF:
>> + writel(param1,&v5param->pcie_sbdf);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + writel(vendor_flags,&v5param->flags);
>> + } else {
>> + switch (type) {
>> + case ACPI_EINJ_PROCESSOR_CORRECTABLE:
>> + case ACPI_EINJ_PROCESSOR_UNCORRECTABLE:
>> + case ACPI_EINJ_PROCESSOR_FATAL:
>> + writel(param1,&v5param->apicid);
>> + writel(SETWA_FLAGS_APICID,&v5param->flags);
>> + break;
>> + case ACPI_EINJ_MEMORY_CORRECTABLE:
>> + case ACPI_EINJ_MEMORY_UNCORRECTABLE:
>> + case ACPI_EINJ_MEMORY_FATAL:
>> + writeq(param1,&v5param->memory_address);
>> + writeq(param2,&v5param->memory_address_range);
>> + writel(SETWA_FLAGS_MEM,&v5param->flags);
>> + break;
>> + case ACPI_EINJ_PCIX_CORRECTABLE:
>> + case ACPI_EINJ_PCIX_UNCORRECTABLE:
>> + case ACPI_EINJ_PCIX_FATAL:
>> + writel(param1,&v5param->pcie_sbdf);
>> + writel(SETWA_FLAGS_PCIE_SBDF,&v5param->flags);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
> I'm a little confused about the ACPI_EINJ_SET_ERROR_TYPE_WITH_ADDRESS command in ACPI5.
> The above code seems like a hard-coded version of
> apei_exec_run(&ctx, ACPI_EINJ_SET_ERROR_TYPE_WITH_ADDRESS).
> Hi Gong, could you please share the ACPI5 version of EINJ table with me? So I could
> get better understanding of the ACPI_EINJ_SET_ERROR_TYPE_WITH_ADDRESS command.
>
You can check ACPI5.0 spec 18.6 for detail. We have internal BIOS to support
ACPI5 and I'm not sure if there is external product to support ACPI5 formally.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists