[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F03B270@ORSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:01:05 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>, Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] acpi/apei/einj: Add extensions to EINJ from rev 5.0 of
acpi spec
> Should we remove the target memory address from the resource list of
> ACPI5 trigger too? Otherwise we may also encounter resource conflict with ACPI5
> trigger table.
I haven't seen any problems while testing this - but perhaps the trigger sequence
generated by this BIOS in ACPI 5 mode doesn't access the target address (though
that would be strange).
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists