[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHGf_=oTUEXBU+szTBSpzcaApKatRGPJMDRZgdMYottf2cGvYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:49:06 -0500
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] signal: oom_kill_task: use SEND_SIG_FORCED instead of force_sig()
2012/2/10 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>:
> Change oom_kill_task() to use do_send_sig_info(SEND_SIG_FORCED)
> instead of force_sig(SIGKILL). With the recent changes we do not
> need force_ to kill the CLONE_NEWPID tasks.
>
> And this is more correct. force_sig() can race with the exiting
> thread even if oom_kill_task() checks p->mm != NULL, while
> do_send_sig_info(group => true) kille the whole process.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> ---
> mm/oom_kill.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 2958fd8..b1e9643 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -472,11 +472,11 @@ static int oom_kill_task(struct task_struct *p)
> pr_err("Kill process %d (%s) sharing same memory\n",
> task_pid_nr(q), q->comm);
> task_unlock(q);
> - force_sig(SIGKILL, q);
> + do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, q, true);
> }
>
> set_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE);
> - force_sig(SIGKILL, p);
> + do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p, true);
>
> return 0;
I don't think I clearly understand this series. But, at least, this
patch is ok to me. thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists