linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] signal: give SEND_SIG_FORCED more power to beat SIGNAL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:45:28 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] signal: give SEND_SIG_FORCED more power to beat
	SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE

Hi Tejun,

On 02/10, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> > --- a/kernel/signal.c
> > +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> > @@ -1059,7 +1059,8 @@ static int __send_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
> >
> >  	assert_spin_locked(&t->sighand->siglock);
> >
> > -	if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, from_ancestor_ns))
> > +	if (!prepare_signal(sig, t,
> > +			from_ancestor_ns || (info == SEND_SIG_FORCED)))
>
> How about the following indentation instead?  :)
>
> 	if (!prepare_signal(sig, t,
> 	    from_ancestor_ns || (info == SEND_SIG_FORCED)))

Well, I am not sure this looks better, although I do not really mind.
But since this patch is already in -mm, I think I won't send v2 ;)

> Please feel free to add Reviewed-by for 2-4.

Thanks!

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/