[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1202131350500.17296@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:55:31 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>
cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ensure that walk_page_range()'s start and end are
page-aligned
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, Dan Smith wrote:
> DR> It doesn't "ensure" anything without CONFIG_DEBUG_VM enabled, which
> DR> isn't the default.
>
> Are you proposing a change in verbiage or a stronger check? A
> VM_BUG_ON() seemed on par with other checks, such as the one in
> get_user_pages_fast().
>
That's not a precedent, there's a big difference between the performance
of gup_fast(), where we can't spare an additional compare and branch, and
walk_page_range(). VM_BUG_ON() is typically used in situations where a
debug kernel has been built, including CONFIG_DEBUG_VM, and the check
helps to isolate a problem that would be otherwise difficult to find. If
that fits the criteria, fine, but it doesn't "ensure" walk_page_range()
always has start and end addresses that are page aligned, so the changelog
needs to be modified to describe why an error in this path wouldn't be
evident.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists