lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pqdh1mvs.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:59:51 -0800
From:	Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ensure that walk_page_range()'s start and end are page-aligned

DR> That's not a precedent, there's a big difference between the
DR> performance of gup_fast(), where we can't spare an additional
DR> compare and branch, and walk_page_range().  VM_BUG_ON() is typically
DR> used in situations where a debug kernel has been built, including
DR> CONFIG_DEBUG_VM, and the check helps to isolate a problem that would
DR> be otherwise difficult to find.

Okay, fair enough. I was trying to stay in line with the other
conventions, knowing that the check would only be done with
CONFIG_DEBUG_VM enabled.

I'd rather just make it always do the check in walk_page_range(). Does
that sound reasonable?

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: danms@...ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ