[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F3BB763.9080006@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:47:15 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
CC: Rob Earhart <earhart@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Next gen kvm api
On 02/07/2012 06:19 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Ah. But then ioeventfd has that as well, unless the other end is in
>> the kernel too.
>
>
> Yes, that was my point exactly :-)
>
> ioeventfd/mmio-over-socketpair to adifferent thread is not faster than
> a synchronous KVM_RUN + writing to an eventfd in userspace modulo a
> couple of cheap syscalls.
>
> The exception is when the other end is in the kernel and there is
> magic optimizations (like there is today with ioeventfd).
vhost seems to schedule a workqueue item unconditionally.
irqfd does have magic optimizations to avoid an extra schedule.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists