[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1202171803380.25191@eggly.anvils>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:13:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] mm: memory book keeping and lru_lock
splitting
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> Yours are not the only patches I was testing in that tree, I tried to
> gather several other series which I should be reviewing if I ever have
> time: Kamezawa-san's page cgroup diet 6, Xiao Guangrong's 4 prio_tree
> cleanups, your 3 radix_tree changes, your 6 shmem changes, your 4 memcg
> miscellaneous, and then your 15 books.
>
> The tree before your final 15 did well under pressure, until I tried to
> rmdir one of the cgroups afterwards: then it crashed nastily, I'll have
> to bisect into that, probably either Kamezawa's or your memcg changes.
So far I haven't succeeded in reproducing that at all: it was real,
but obviously harder to get than I assumed - indeed, no good reason
to associate it with any of those patches, might even be in 3.3-rc.
It did involve a NULL pointer dereference in mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(),
somewhere below compact_zone() - but repercussions were causing the
stacktrace to scroll offscreen, so I didn't get good details.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists