[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120218023521.GB13538@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 03:35:21 +0100
From: Witold Baryluk <baryluk@....if.uj.edu.pl>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>
Subject: ODEBUG: selftest warnings failed 4 != 5 (WARNING: at
lib/debugobjects.c:908 check_results.constprop.9)
Hello everybody,
I recently enabled a CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS kconfig option, and this is what I got when booting
...
[ 0.000000] Linux version 3.3.0-rc3-t43-devel-smp-00278-g4903062-dirty (baryluk@...dniczarny) (gcc version 4.6.2 (Debian 4.6.2-14) ) #27 SMP Fri Feb 17 20:13:29 CE
...
...
...
[ 0.000000] SLUB: Genslabs=15, HWalign=64, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=1, Nodes=1
[ 0.000000] Hierarchical RCU implementation.
[ 0.000000] RCU debugfs-based tracing is enabled.
[ 0.000000] RCU lockdep checking is enabled.
[ 0.000000] NR_IRQS:2304 nr_irqs:256 16
[ 0.000000] CPU 0 irqstacks, hard=f5408000 soft=f540a000
[ 0.000000] Extended CMOS year: 2000
[ 0.000000] Console: colour VGA+ 80x25
[ 0.000000] console [tty0] enabled
[ 0.000000] Lock dependency validator: Copyright (c) 2006 Red Hat, Inc., Ingo Molnar
[ 0.000000] ... MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES: 8
[ 0.000000] ... MAX_LOCK_DEPTH: 48
[ 0.000000] ... MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS: 8191
[ 0.000000] ... CLASSHASH_SIZE: 4096
[ 0.000000] ... MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES: 16384
[ 0.000000] ... MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS: 32768
[ 0.000000] ... CHAINHASH_SIZE: 16384
[ 0.000000] memory used by lock dependency info: 3823 kB
[ 0.000000] per task-struct memory footprint: 1920 bytes
[ 0.000000] ------------------------
[ 0.000000] | Locking API testsuite:
...
...
[ 0.000000] -------------------------------------------------------
[ 0.000000] Good, all 218 testcases passed! |
[ 0.000000] ---------------------------------
[ 0.000000] ODEBUG: 14 of 14 active objects replaced
[ 0.000000] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 0.000000] WARNING: at lib/debugobjects.c:908 check_results.constprop.9+0x11c/0x140()
[ 0.000000] Hardware name: 2669UYD
[ 0.000000] ODEBUG: selftest warnings failed 4 != 5
[ 0.000000] Modules linked in:
[ 0.000000] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.3.0-rc3-t43-devel-smp-00272-g7ada1dd-dirty #25
[ 0.000000] Call Trace:
[ 0.000000] [<c104a4d2>] warn_slowpath_common+0x72/0xa0
[ 0.000000] [<c1b5eb22>] ? check_results.constprop.9+0x11c/0x140
[ 0.000000] [<c1b5eb22>] ? check_results.constprop.9+0x11c/0x140
[ 0.000000] [<c104a5a3>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x33/0x40
[ 0.000000] [<c1b5eb22>] check_results.constprop.9+0x11c/0x140
[ 0.000000] [<c1b5edb8>] debug_objects_selftest+0x1c3/0x2d1
[ 0.000000] [<c1b5efbf>] debug_objects_mem_init+0x6c/0x6e
[ 0.000000] [<c1b3a6f0>] start_kernel+0x2a7/0x33a
[ 0.000000] [<c1b3a25a>] ? obsolete_checksetup+0x95/0x95
[ 0.000000] [<c1b3a11e>] ? reserve_ebda_region+0x6b/0x6d
[ 0.000000] [<c1b3a0ac>] i386_start_kernel+0x9b/0xa2
[ 0.000000] ---[ end trace 4eaa2a86a8e2da22 ]---
...
Kernel is booting however without bigger problems. I have some lockdep
problems latter, but I'm not sure if this is related (already reported
few days ago to few people including Andrew).
I cannot say when bug was introduced, because well, I noticed it just
today when inspecting some kernel messages in more detail, and because I
had previously not CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS not set in kernel config.
This is IBM Thinkpad T43, with Intel Pentium-M (32-bit). Was using
gcc-4.6.2-14 from Debian sid.
Oh, It looks that it already was noticed by Stephen Boyd on -mm kernel
( https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/14/132 ), but now looks to happen on
mainline. Can a fix be rechecked and merged?
Or should I start using -mm kernel for testing more fresh code?
Regards,
Witek
--
Witold Baryluk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists