[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120220100436.5fbbf5cc1b1df539ed8aca24@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:04:36 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm
tree related)
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 21:20:37 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next fails to build (s390 allnoconfig) like this:
>
> In file included from arch/s390/mm/maccess.c:15:
> include/linux/gfp.h: In function 'gfp_zonelist':
> include/linux/gfp.h:267: error: '__enabled_CONFIG_NUMA' undeclared (first use in this function)
> include/linux/gfp.h:267: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> include/linux/gfp.h:267: error: for each function it appears in.)
> include/linux/gfp.h:267: error: '__enabled_CONFIG_NUMA_MODULE' undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> and many more. This also happens in other architectures and configs but
> (obviously) not all builds.
>
> Presumably caused by commit 053361e1a072 ("mm: replace NUMA_BUILD with
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA)").
I have removed that patch from the akpm tree until a solution is worked out.
Everything seemed to rebase ok with out it and I can't see much actually
depending on it.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists