[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F413B8D.5080307@xenotime.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:12:29 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: add config NUMA stub to all architectures
On 02/19/2012 09:01 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 21:30, Andrew Morton<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:08:15 +0400
>> Konstantin Khlebnikov<khlebnikov@...nvz.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Config NUMA must be defined for all architectures,
>>> otherwise IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) does not work.
>>> Some arch-specific Kconfig already has this stub.
>>> This patch adds it to all remaining.
>>
>> It would be better to teach IS_ENABLED() to handle this situation. I
>> don't think there's a way of doing this with cpp :(
>>
>> This limitation makes IS_ENABLED pretty dangerous, doesn't it? It
>> makes it very easy to introduce build breakage with unexpected Kconfig
>> combinations.
>
> Indeed. Recently I discovered IS_ENABLED() and started recommending it
> to people for new code. But now I've seen the CONFIG_NUMA breakage,
> I no longer think this is a good recommendation.
adding Michal & linux-kbuild to cc: list.
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists