[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUYCGoZoUHWMtMCwAJ2ofweaeLF3U89P5EvrNGcn=6apw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 18:01:33 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: add config NUMA stub to all architectures
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 21:30, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:08:15 +0400
> Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org> wrote:
>
>> Config NUMA must be defined for all architectures,
>> otherwise IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) does not work.
>> Some arch-specific Kconfig already has this stub.
>> This patch adds it to all remaining.
>
> It would be better to teach IS_ENABLED() to handle this situation. I
> don't think there's a way of doing this with cpp :(
>
> This limitation makes IS_ENABLED pretty dangerous, doesn't it? It
> makes it very easy to introduce build breakage with unexpected Kconfig
> combinations.
Indeed. Recently I discovered IS_ENABLED() and started recommending it
to people for new code. But now I've seen the CONFIG_NUMA breakage,
I no longer think this is a good recommendation.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists