[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120219142911.12300.7497.stgit@zurg>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 18:29:11 +0400
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] percpu: fix generic definition of __this_cpu_add_and_return()
This patch adds missed "__" into function prefix.
Otherwise on all archectures (except x86) it expands to irq/preemtion-safe
variant: _this_cpu_generic_add_return(), which do extra irq-save/irq-restore.
Optimal generic implementation is __this_cpu_generic_add_return().
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
---
include/linux/percpu.h | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/percpu.h b/include/linux/percpu.h
index 32cd1f6..3b609eb 100644
--- a/include/linux/percpu.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu.h
@@ -718,7 +718,8 @@ do { \
# ifndef __this_cpu_add_return_8
# define __this_cpu_add_return_8(pcp, val) __this_cpu_generic_add_return(pcp, val)
# endif
-# define __this_cpu_add_return(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call_return2(this_cpu_add_return_, pcp, val)
+# define __this_cpu_add_return(pcp, val) \
+ __pcpu_size_call_return2(__this_cpu_add_return_, pcp, val)
#endif
#define __this_cpu_sub_return(pcp, val) this_cpu_add_return(pcp, -(val))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists