lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:53:08 -0600 (CST) From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org> cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu: fix generic definition of __this_cpu_add_and_return() On Sun, 19 Feb 2012, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > This patch adds missed "__" into function prefix. > Otherwise on all archectures (except x86) it expands to irq/preemtion-safe > variant: _this_cpu_generic_add_return(), which do extra irq-save/irq-restore. > Optimal generic implementation is __this_cpu_generic_add_return(). Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists