linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] percpu: fix generic definition of __this_cpu_add_and

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120221165841.GA12236@google.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:58:41 -0800
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu: fix generic definition of
 __this_cpu_add_and_return()

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:53:08AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> 
> > This patch adds missed "__" into function prefix.
> > Otherwise on all archectures (except x86) it expands to irq/preemtion-safe
> > variant: _this_cpu_generic_add_return(), which do extra irq-save/irq-restore.
> > Optimal generic implementation is __this_cpu_generic_add_return().
> 
> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>

Applied to 3.3-fixes.  Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/