[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120220153452.GA4962@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:34:52 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v3.3] x86: Test saved %rip in NMI to determine
nested NMI
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 09:10 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > Note, it does not seem to cause any destruction, but screw up
> > > profiling.
> >
> > Except if the source of the NMI was not profiling, right?
>
> Well, what else are NMIs used for? [...]
There's various (legacy) diagnostics NMIs on various x86
platforms, mostly signalling some sort of deep trouble
with the hw.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists