[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1329702253.14084.22.camel@debian>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:44:13 +0800
From: "Alex,Shi" <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tim.c.chen@...el.com, ying.huang@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP_STREAM performance regression on commit b3613118
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 13:33 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:50:39 +0100
>
> > Le vendredi 17 février 2012 à 16:18 +0800, Alex,Shi a écrit :
> >> The tcp_stream loop back performance has about 10% drop on the
> >> commitment on our core2 2 sockets server. This commit has 2
> >> parents(7505afe28, 5983fe), but both of them have no regression. So
> >> guess the impact just happened when this 2 parents joint. That beyond
> >> our capability to dig it more.
> >>
> >> Any ideas?
> >
> > Most probably the more accurate truesize determination is responsible of
> > this tcp regression, since some prior assumptions might be wrong.
> >
> > Want to give more information on the workload ?
> > Is it a 32 or 64 bit kernel ?
It is 64 bit kernel. Currently we only care 64bit.
Will try to bring more statistic after our lab recovered.
>
> And let's start CC:'ing netdev too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists