linux-kernel - Re: TCP_STREAM performance regression on commit b3613118

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:45:17 +0800
From:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Tang Feng <feng.tang@...el.com>
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tim.c.chen@...el.com, ying.huang@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP_STREAM performance regression on commit b3613118

On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 13:33 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:50:39 +0100
> 
> > Le vendredi 17 février 2012 à 16:18 +0800, Alex,Shi a écrit :
> >> The tcp_stream loop back performance has about 10% drop on the
> >> commitment on our core2 2 sockets server. This commit has 2
> >> parents(7505afe28, 5983fe), but both of them have no regression. So
> >> guess the impact just happened when this 2 parents joint. That beyond
> >> our capability to dig it more.
> >> 
> >> Any ideas? 
> > 
> > Most probably the more accurate truesize determination is responsible of
> > this tcp regression, since some prior assumptions might be wrong.
> > 
> > Want to give more information on the workload ?
> > Is it a 32 or 64 bit kernel ?
> 
> And let's start CC:'ing netdev too.

Add CC to tang feng, He is working on this issue. 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/