lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:30:08 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Do the x86 kernel entry points need an xabort on TSX cpus?

On 02/10/2012 09:24 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> 
> Is that architecturally guaranteed?  (My manual suggests that it's 
> specifically *not* guaranteed, which is surprising.)
> 

I asked internally for a statement, and got the following:

"Intel does not expect operating systems to require XABORT at the entry
points.  Intel takes system security extremely seriously and that any
functionality added is scrutinized for security implications."

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ