[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F43F25E.3030004@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:37:02 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hjl.tools@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/30] x32: Add x32 VDSO support
On 02/21/2012 11:29 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> The vsyscall page shouldn't be mapped for x32 tasks...
>
> How is that possible? It lives in the fixmap and is presumably
> visible from any 64-bit code.
>
> Admittedly, x32 tasks are probably somewhat difficult to trick into
> calling addresses with high bits set, but it's not necessarily
> impossible.
>
Fair enough, and it's not necessarily all that hard either.
And it's visible even in a 32-bit task, although a 32-bit task has to
switch into 64-bit mode. Yet another reason the vsyscall page needs to die.
I was having delusions that we could have a task-owned PDT in negative
space, but that would require unsharing the third level, too, which is
just way too messy.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists