[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201202221436.29474.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:36:29 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc: plagnioj@...osoft.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rmallon@...il.com,
linux@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/19] ARM: at91/at91x40: remove use of at91_sys_read/write
Hi Nicolas and Jean-Christophe,
On Wednesday 22 February 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static void at91x40_idle(void)
> * Disable the processor clock. The processor will be automatically
> * re-enabled by an interrupt or by a reset.
> */
> - at91_sys_write(AT91_PS_CR, AT91_PS_CR_CPU);
> + __raw_writel(AT91_PS_CR_CPU, AT91_PS_CR);
> cpu_do_idle();
> }
How about making this writel_relaxed in the process?
I would like to see the use of __raw_*() get reduced in code that gets
touched. In most cases writel_relaxed/readl_relaxed is the correct
accessor function instead.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists