[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F463374.3080502@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:09:16 +0530
From: Shubhrajyoti <shubhrajyoti@...com>
To: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@...com>
CC: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
khilman@...com, tony@...mide.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] gpio/omap: fix trigger type to unsigned
On Thursday 23 February 2012 05:40 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote:
> The GPIO trigger parameter is of type unsigned.
> enum {
> IRQ_TYPE_NONE = 0x00000000,
> IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING = 0x00000001,
> IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING = 0x00000002,
> IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH = (IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING),
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH = 0x00000004,
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW = 0x00000008,
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK = (IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH),
> IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK = 0x0000000f,
>
> IRQ_TYPE_PROBE = 0x00000010,
> ...
> };
> Even though gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned type) has the right type
> of parameter, the subsequent called functions set_gpio_triggering() and
> set_gpio_trigger() wrongly makes it signed integer. Fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@...com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 5 +++--
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> index 3dd4b3a..67535c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static void _set_gpio_debounce(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned gpio,
> }
>
> static inline void set_gpio_trigger(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio,
> - int trigger)
> + unsigned trigger)
> {
> void __iomem *base = bank->base;
> u32 gpio_bit = 1 << gpio;
> @@ -314,7 +314,8 @@ static void _toggle_gpio_edge_triggering(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio)
> static void _toggle_gpio_edge_triggering(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio) {}
> #endif
>
> -static int _set_gpio_triggering(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int trigger)
> +static int _set_gpio_triggering(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio,
> + unsigned trigger)
you meant unsigned int ? could it be made u32.
> {
> void __iomem *reg = bank->base;
> void __iomem *base = bank->base;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists