[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120223223832.GK22536@google.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:38:32 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 02:41:10PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Considering everything internally as flat, isn't it simpler. So cgroup
> tree still might look hierarchical but actually controller treats it
> as.
> root
> / / | \ \
> g1 g2 g3 g4 g5
I don't know. Mixing the above with controllers which implement
proper nesting makes my head explode (why is there a hierarchy at
all?). Root is always special anyway. Just treating root differently
and collapsing the rest of hierarchies should do, right?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists