lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:38:42 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <>
To:	Willy Tarreau <>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <>,,
	Raphael Prevost <>,
	Suresh Siddha <>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] i387: stable kernel backport

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Willy Tarreau <> wrote:
> OK so indeed I will only be able to check that it boots :-/

Well, we could do some trivial test-harness that just forces the issue
with regular timer interrupts (and even without AES-NI). I think Peter
talked about that when we were trying to hunt it down - but I think he
was then able to reproduce the problem without anything special and we
dropped it.

Essentially, just doing something like

    if (irq_fpu_usable()) {

in do_irq() and do_softirq() would stress-test things even without
wireless, and even without AES-NI.

You'd still need an x86-32 machine to test on, because x86-64 was
immune to this issue.

But yeah, the impact of this seems to be small enough that for older
kernels (which are likely used on older systems for maintenance
anyway) disabling AES-NI on x86-32 really might be the way to go.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists