[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADjiTvBr9Y7vPHahpdggzAwySCLHRjNDR4Tn4qDFfU6oeZ-DpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 09:03:40 +0200
From: "Sakkinen, Jarkko" <jarkko.sakkinen@...el.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: security xattr setting on inode creation
Hi Hugh,
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
> Thanks a lot for doing this, Jarkko: I knew nothing about it.
> And thank you James for reviewing, I felt much happier seeing that.
>
> I did fiddle around with it slightly, to reduce the added textsize,
> and eliminate it when CONFIG_TMPFS_XATTR is off. Please, Jarkko
> and James, complain bitterly if I've messed up the good work.
Thank you for the nice feedback :) LGTM.
>
> [PATCH] tmpfs: security xattr setting on inode creation
>
> From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...el.com>
>
> Adds to generic xattr support introduced in Linux 3.0 by
> implementing initxattrs callback. This enables consulting
> of security attributes from LSM and EVM when inode is created.
>
> [hughd: moved under CONFIG_TMPFS_XATTR, with memcpy in shmem_xattr_alloc]
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> ---
> mm/shmem.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -1178,6 +1178,12 @@ static struct inode *shmem_get_inode(str
> static const struct inode_operations shmem_symlink_inode_operations;
> static const struct inode_operations shmem_short_symlink_operations;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS_XATTR
> +static int shmem_initxattrs(struct inode *, const struct xattr *, void *);
> +#else
> +#define shmem_initxattrs NULL
> +#endif
> +
> static int
> shmem_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
> loff_t pos, unsigned len, unsigned flags,
> @@ -1490,7 +1496,7 @@ shmem_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct de
> if (inode) {
> error = security_inode_init_security(inode, dir,
> &dentry->d_name,
> - NULL, NULL);
> + shmem_initxattrs, NULL);
> if (error) {
> if (error != -EOPNOTSUPP) {
> iput(inode);
> @@ -1630,7 +1636,7 @@ static int shmem_symlink(struct inode *d
> return -ENOSPC;
>
> error = security_inode_init_security(inode, dir, &dentry->d_name,
> - NULL, NULL);
> + shmem_initxattrs, NULL);
> if (error) {
> if (error != -EOPNOTSUPP) {
> iput(inode);
> @@ -1704,6 +1710,66 @@ static void shmem_put_link(struct dentry
> * filesystem level, though.
> */
>
> +/*
> + * Allocate new xattr and copy in the value; but leave the name to callers.
> + */
> +static struct shmem_xattr *shmem_xattr_alloc(const void *value, size_t size)
> +{
> + struct shmem_xattr *new_xattr;
> + size_t len;
> +
> + /* wrap around? */
> + len = sizeof(*new_xattr) + size;
> + if (len <= sizeof(*new_xattr))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + new_xattr = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!new_xattr)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + new_xattr->size = size;
> + memcpy(new_xattr->value, value, size);
> + return new_xattr;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Callback for security_inode_init_security() for acquiring xattrs.
> + */
> +static int shmem_initxattrs(struct inode *inode,
> + const struct xattr *xattr_array,
> + void *fs_info)
> +{
> + struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(inode);
> + const struct xattr *xattr;
> + struct shmem_xattr *new_xattr;
> + size_t len;
> +
> + for (xattr = xattr_array; xattr->name != NULL; xattr++) {
> + new_xattr = shmem_xattr_alloc(xattr->value, xattr->value_len);
> + if (!new_xattr)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + len = strlen(xattr->name) + 1;
> + new_xattr->name = kmalloc(XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX_LEN + len,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!new_xattr->name) {
> + kfree(new_xattr);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(new_xattr->name, XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX,
> + XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX_LEN);
> + memcpy(new_xattr->name + XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX_LEN,
> + xattr->name, len);
> +
> + spin_lock(&info->lock);
> + list_add(&new_xattr->list, &info->xattr_list);
> + spin_unlock(&info->lock);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int shmem_xattr_get(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name,
> void *buffer, size_t size)
> {
> @@ -1731,24 +1797,17 @@ static int shmem_xattr_get(struct dentry
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int shmem_xattr_set(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name,
> +static int shmem_xattr_set(struct inode *inode, const char *name,
> const void *value, size_t size, int flags)
> {
> - struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
> struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(inode);
> struct shmem_xattr *xattr;
> struct shmem_xattr *new_xattr = NULL;
> - size_t len;
> int err = 0;
>
> /* value == NULL means remove */
> if (value) {
> - /* wrap around? */
> - len = sizeof(*new_xattr) + size;
> - if (len <= sizeof(*new_xattr))
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - new_xattr = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
> + new_xattr = shmem_xattr_alloc(value, size);
> if (!new_xattr)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -1757,9 +1816,6 @@ static int shmem_xattr_set(struct dentry
> kfree(new_xattr);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> -
> - new_xattr->size = size;
> - memcpy(new_xattr->value, value, size);
> }
>
> spin_lock(&info->lock);
> @@ -1858,7 +1914,7 @@ static int shmem_setxattr(struct dentry
> if (size == 0)
> value = ""; /* empty EA, do not remove */
>
> - return shmem_xattr_set(dentry, name, value, size, flags);
> + return shmem_xattr_set(dentry->d_inode, name, value, size, flags);
>
> }
>
> @@ -1878,7 +1934,7 @@ static int shmem_removexattr(struct dent
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> - return shmem_xattr_set(dentry, name, NULL, 0, XATTR_REPLACE);
> + return shmem_xattr_set(dentry->d_inode, name, NULL, 0, XATTR_REPLACE);
> }
>
> static bool xattr_is_trusted(const char *name)
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists