lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1330359695.5541.45.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
Date:	Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:21:32 +0000
From:	"Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To:	Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
CC:	"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	"xemul@...allels.com" <xemul@...allels.com>,
	"neilb@...e.de" <neilb@...e.de>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"jbottomley@...allels.com" <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
	"bfields@...ldses.org" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"devel@...nvz.org" <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] SUNRPC: release per-net clients lock before
 calling PipeFS dentries creation

On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 19:50 +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> Lockdep is sad otherwise, because inode mutex is taken on PipeFS dentry
> creation, which can be called on mount notification, where this per-net client
> lock is taken on clients list walk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
> 
> ---
>  net/sunrpc/clnt.c |   10 +++++++---
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> index bb7ed2f3..ddb5741 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static void rpc_register_client(struct rpc_clnt *clnt)
>  	struct sunrpc_net *sn = net_generic(clnt->cl_xprt->xprt_net, sunrpc_net_id);
>  
>  	spin_lock(&sn->rpc_client_lock);
> -	list_add(&clnt->cl_clients, &sn->all_clients);
> +	list_add_tail(&clnt->cl_clients, &sn->all_clients);
>  	spin_unlock(&sn->rpc_client_lock);
>  }
>  
> @@ -208,15 +208,19 @@ static int rpc_pipefs_event(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
>  			    void *ptr)
>  {
>  	struct super_block *sb = ptr;
> -	struct rpc_clnt *clnt;
> +	struct rpc_clnt *clnt, *tmp;
>  	int error = 0;
>  	struct sunrpc_net *sn = net_generic(sb->s_fs_info, sunrpc_net_id);
>  
>  	spin_lock(&sn->rpc_client_lock);
> -	list_for_each_entry(clnt, &sn->all_clients, cl_clients) {
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(clnt, tmp, &sn->all_clients, cl_clients) {
> +		atomic_inc(&clnt->cl_count);
> +		spin_unlock(&sn->rpc_client_lock);
>  		error = __rpc_pipefs_event(clnt, event, sb);
> +		rpc_release_client(clnt);
>  		if (error)
>  			break;
> +		spin_lock(&sn->rpc_client_lock);
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock(&sn->rpc_client_lock);
>  	return error;
> 

This won't be safe. Nothing guarantees that 'tmp' remains valid after
you drop the spin_lock.

I think you rather need to add a check for whether clnt->cl_dentry is in
the right state (NULL if RPC_PIPEFS_UMOUNT or non-NULL if
RPC_PIPEFS_MOUNT) before deciding whether or not to atomic_inc() and
drop the lock, so that you can restart the loop after calling
__rpc_pipefs_event().


-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@...app.com
www.netapp.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ