[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1202271202430.1902@cl320.eecs.utk.edu>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:04:27 -0500
From: Vince Weaver <vweaver1@...s.utk.edu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <mingo@...e.hu>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_event use rdpmc rather than rdmsr when possible in
kernel
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > I couldn't find another usable rdpmc() call in the kernel. Should I add
> > one? I admit I hadn't thought that this might break VMs not expecting
> > rdpmc calls from the kernel.
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
>
> #define rdpmc(counter, low, high) \
> do { \
> u64 _l = native_read_pmc((counter)); \
> (low) = (u32)_l; \
> (high) = (u32)(_l >> 32); \
> } while (0)
ugh I did multiple recursive greps, and definitely searched msr.h by
hand various times looking for that and I somehow missed it each time.
I'll update the patch.
Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists