[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1330359518.11248.72.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:18:38 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Vince Weaver <vweaver1@...s.utk.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_event use rdpmc rather than rdmsr when possible in
kernel
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 11:06 -0500, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > > + new_raw_count=native_read_pmc(hwc->event_base_rdpmc);
> >
> > That really wants to be rdpmc(), bypassing paravirt like that isn't
> > nice.
>
> I couldn't find another usable rdpmc() call in the kernel. Should I add
> one? I admit I hadn't thought that this might break VMs not expecting
> rdpmc calls from the kernel.
arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
#define rdpmc(counter, low, high) \
do { \
u64 _l = native_read_pmc((counter)); \
(low) = (u32)_l; \
(high) = (u32)(_l >> 32); \
} while (0)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists