linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: Add basic support for the Congatec CGEB BIOS interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:24:43 +0100
From:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: Add basic support for the Congatec CGEB BIOS
 interface

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 02:58:27PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
> 
> 
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:07:52PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Hi Samuel,
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 05:39:27PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > > Hi Sascha,
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 02:26:31PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > > The Congatec CGEB is a BIOS interface found on some Congatec x86
> > > > modules. It provides access to on board peripherals like I2C busses
> > > > and watchdogs. This driver contains the basic support for accessing
> > > > the CGEB interface and registers the child devices.
> > > After looking at the code, I'm not entirely sure this one belongs to
> > > drivers/mfd/. Have you thought about putting it under arch/x86/platform/ ?
> > > There are similar examples there, like uv or olpc.
> > 
> > I don't mind putting it in arch/x86/platform instead. I'm an ARM guy and
> > on ARM there currently is a rush to move everything looking remotely
> > like a driver out of arch/arm/ to drivers/, so putting it under
> > drivers/mfd/ seemed logical to me.
> Yes, this seems to be the trend apparently. Could you try pushing that into
> the x86/platform, please ? If they put you under fire, I guess I could take
> this patchset. But they have several "BIOS interfaces" there already...

Ok, I'll put on my asbestos suit and give it a try.

Thanks
 Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/